emailfacebookinstagrammenutwitterweiboyoutube


From fragmentation to control: rethinking legal operations at scale

Joseph Sanderson, chief executive officer at LEAP Enterprise, shares why disconnected systems are a blocker to progress, and explores the strategic value of accessible, unified data

Halimah Nisa||

On 18th June 2026, I had the opportunity to address legal operations leaders at LegalTechTalk in London on what I believe is the defining infrastructure challenge facing mid to large-sized law firms today. The conversations that followed confirmed what I already suspected: fragmentation is no longer a background concern — it has become an active constraint on growth, compliance and control.

There is a question I ask every senior leader at a mid to large-sized firm I meet: how many systems does your firm rely on to run its day-to-day operations? The answers rarely surprise me anymore: eight, 12, sometimes more. When I ask how well those systems talk to one another, the silence usually says everything.

Fragmentation is a growing issue. The firms I speak with didn’t set out to build unintegrated technology estates. They grew into them. A practice management system (PMS) here, a billing tool there, a separate compliance module bolted on after a regulatory update, a handful of spreadsheets filling the gaps in between. Each decision made sense at the time. Collectively, they’ve created something that is becoming increasingly difficult to govern, audit or scale.

The cost of complexity

Fragmentation isn’t simply an IT or operational headache. When your financial records live in one place, your matter management in another, and your compliance monitoring somewhere else entirely, the version of truth each department is working from is never quite the same. Decisions get made on incomplete information. Reporting takes longer than it should. Reconciliation becomes a recurring manual exercise.

Then there is the regulatory dimension. The Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) expectations around financial controls and compliance oversight are increasing. The government’s Making Tax Digital (MTD) continues to reshape how firms must manage and report their finances. These pressures that expose every crack in a disjointed infrastructure — often at precisely the moment you can least afford it.

Firms operating across multiple departments or locations feel this most acutely. When your Manchester office is running a different process from your London team, and neither has real-time visibility into the other’s workload or financial position, you’re not running one firm. You’re running several loosely affiliated ones, and the seams don’t always hold.

How law firms can reclaim control at scale

True control comes from simplicity at the infrastructure level, not from complexity. This is precisely the problem that LEAP Enterprise was built to solve. Rather than asking firms to integrate yet another tool into an already crowded technology estate, we took a different approach: bringing productivity, legal accounting, compliance monitoring and AI-powered intelligence together in a unified platform — purpose-built for the scale and complexity of mid to large-sized firms. No modules, no separate subscriptions, no gaps to bridge with a workaround.

This creates a single source of truth. Every matter, every financial transaction, every workflow, every compliance obligation is visible, connected, and consistent across the entire firm. Partners get the real-time dashboards they need to make informed decisions. Operations leaders get the firm-wide visibility that fragmented systems simply cannot provide. Fee earners get tools that work with their day, not against it.

That is what we mean by a lawyer-first approach. The technology serves the people using it, not the other way around.

Why this matters now

I’m often asked whether the fragmentation problem is genuinely urgent, or whether firms can afford to manage it gradually over time. My answer is that the window for gradual is closing.

Three pressures are converging simultaneously. Regulatory expectations are increasing in both scope and specificity. Client expectations around transparency, responsiveness, and value are rising. And internally, firms are under real pressure to do more with less.

Fragmented infrastructure amplifies these pressures. Every new regulatory requirement becomes a manual process to retrofit across disparate systems. Every client reporting request triggers a cross-system reconciliation exercise. Every growth ambition runs into the ceiling of what your current infrastructure can support.

This is why the firms now moving to build scalable, integrated foundations are best placed to take advantage of what comes next. And what comes next, in large part, is AI.

AI belongs in the infrastructure

There is a lot of noise in the legal technology market about AI right now. I strongly push back on the framing of AI as a layer you add onto existing systems.

AI is only as useful as the data and processes it has access to. If your underlying systems are unintegrated, your AI capabilities will be too. You’ll get point solutions solving isolated problems, rather than intelligent tools that genuinely understand the full context of your matters, your clients and your firm.

At LEAP Enterprise, legal AI is embedded directly into the platform, drawing from integrated data rather than siloed subsets. That’s not a technical detail. It’s the difference between AI that adds genuine value and AI that adds another interface to manage.

Likewise, our legal accounting, powered by Efimis, is integrated within the same platform. This means financial intelligence is available where decisions are being made, not locked away in a separate system that requires a report request and a 48-hour wait.

Structure is an enabler, not a constraint

Governance, structure, and process standardisation tend to get framed as the boring prerequisites you have to do before you get to the interesting stuff.

However, I believe that structure is what allows firms to scale without chaos. Governance is what allows firms to adopt new technology with confidence. Accountability frameworks enable partners to make decisions based on data rather than instinct.

You cannot scale what you cannot see, and you cannot innovate without control. These are not constraints on growth; they are the foundation of it.

The firms that will lead the next decade in legal services are not necessarily the largest or the most technologically adventurous. They are the ones that build the right infrastructure and use that foundation to move faster, govern better, and grow with confidence.

That is what we are here to help you build.

Joseph Sanderson is chief executive officer at LEAP Enterprise, the purpose-built legal platform for mid- to large law firms requiring deep systems integration, enterprise-level financial control, and AI-powered intelligence. Find out more at https://www.leaplegalsoftware.com/uk/leap-enterprise/.

LPM Conference 2026

LPM Conference 2026

The LPM annual conference is the market-leading event for management leaders in SME law firms

Levelling the scales

How far has the SME legal sector come on the journey to gender equality?