emailfacebookinstagrammenutwitterweiboyoutube

Why SME law firms need to embrace real-time speech recognition, Advanced


Why SME law firms need to embrace real-time speech recognition

Kim Williams, product manager, digital dictation at Advanced, says technology has now advanced to the point where all firms should unequivocally embrace real-time speech recognition.

Kim Williams, product manager, digital dictation|Advanced|

In the beginning, there was dictation to a secretary, then on to a 30-min tape, and now to digital devices, such as your mobile phone. And as digital dictation has developed, so too has speech recognition technology. It means that many firms now dispatch dictated digital recordings to a back-end speech recognition engine that turns speech into text. This is fairly efficient, but, increasingly, there’s a much better option.

Technology has now advanced to the point where all firms should unequivocally embrace real-time speech recognition. What happens is that the text is created as the lawyer dictates. So, users get an instant reassurance that they’re being heard accurately. But more to the point, using the right software enables documents to be created near instantaneously – resulting in significant time and cost savings and raised client service levels. These bring very good news in the current climate, when firms are having to find efficiencies wherever possible.

Of course, like every new technology, real-time speech recognition has gone through a developmental curve. Previous incarnations may have been relatively slow and required a powerful PC in order to get the best results. But today’s most advanced legal speech recognition applications, like ours, removes these barriers and are astoundingly efficient. For instance, you can dictate into any template on any platform. Letters and contracts can be produced at the speed of speech – which is three times faster than typing.

Users need to undertake around an hour’s training in giving the software commands that will format the dictation. After that, it’s a matter of the software ‘learning’ your speech patterns and accent. Of course, bespoke legal speech recognition tools, already know and understand legal vocabulary and context. As a result, users can quickly achieve almost 100% accuracy. Plus the tool can be accessed on any device, at any time, from any location.

The advantages are clear. Lawyers gain great flexibility to work remotely; transcription costs are reduced; a great burden is lifted from support staff; work is turned around much more quickly. More than ever, firms need to carve out a competitive advantage. This supplies a huge one.

Cybersecurity for law firms in 2026: why response and client trust are inextricably linked

Alex Day | Legal sector lead |
At LegalEx and the British Legal Technology Forum earlier this year, one theme cut through every conversation. Most mid-sized UK law firms believe they are reasonably cybersecure. They use Microsoft 365. They have security policies. They are renewing their cyber insurance. Yet when we ask one simple question, conversations become more thoughtful: If we were […]

Train your own, grow your firm: the business case for the SQE in SME law firms

Henna Zafar | Business development manager, BARBRI |
For many of the SME law firms we work with, this autumn is the first time they will support trainees through the SQE. The concerns we hear are consistent — firms don’t feel they know enough about the SQE, most don’t have a learning and development team and partners are already stretched. Those concerns are […]