emailfacebookinstagrammenutwitterweiboyoutube

Why SME law firms need to embrace real-time speech recognition, Advanced


Why SME law firms need to embrace real-time speech recognition

Kim Williams, product manager, digital dictation at Advanced, says technology has now advanced to the point where all firms should unequivocally embrace real-time speech recognition.

Kim Williams, product manager, digital dictation|Advanced|

In the beginning, there was dictation to a secretary, then on to a 30-min tape, and now to digital devices, such as your mobile phone. And as digital dictation has developed, so too has speech recognition technology. It means that many firms now dispatch dictated digital recordings to a back-end speech recognition engine that turns speech into text. This is fairly efficient, but, increasingly, there’s a much better option.

Technology has now advanced to the point where all firms should unequivocally embrace real-time speech recognition. What happens is that the text is created as the lawyer dictates. So, users get an instant reassurance that they’re being heard accurately. But more to the point, using the right software enables documents to be created near instantaneously – resulting in significant time and cost savings and raised client service levels. These bring very good news in the current climate, when firms are having to find efficiencies wherever possible.

Of course, like every new technology, real-time speech recognition has gone through a developmental curve. Previous incarnations may have been relatively slow and required a powerful PC in order to get the best results. But today’s most advanced legal speech recognition applications, like ours, removes these barriers and are astoundingly efficient. For instance, you can dictate into any template on any platform. Letters and contracts can be produced at the speed of speech – which is three times faster than typing.

Users need to undertake around an hour’s training in giving the software commands that will format the dictation. After that, it’s a matter of the software ‘learning’ your speech patterns and accent. Of course, bespoke legal speech recognition tools, already know and understand legal vocabulary and context. As a result, users can quickly achieve almost 100% accuracy. Plus the tool can be accessed on any device, at any time, from any location.

The advantages are clear. Lawyers gain great flexibility to work remotely; transcription costs are reduced; a great burden is lifted from support staff; work is turned around much more quickly. More than ever, firms need to carve out a competitive advantage. This supplies a huge one.

Stuck in the messy middle: why so many firms can’t seem to operationalise AI

Laura Wenzel | Global marketing and insights director at iManage |
At first glance, a key figure from our recent global knowledge work benchmark report seems like a triumph: 85% of knowledge work organisations, including law firms and corporate legal departments, are doing something with AI. But look a little closer, and the story changes. Only 17% have truly operationalised AI within their workflows. The rest are somewhere […]

Understanding the distinct growth challenges of complex law firms

Dani Pisciottano | Head of marketing, LEAP Enterprise |
When we talk about growth in the legal sector, we tend to reach for a single word to describe very different journeys. A three-partner practice adding its fourth lawyer and a fifty-partner law firm opening a new office are both ‘growing’ — but almost nothing about what that growth demands of them is the same. […]